Not for Profit and For Profit Companies Under the same Leadership (why Essay

Not for Profit and For Profit Companies Under the same Leadership (why it scum bag happen) - Essay ExampleThe authors results indicate that the risk propensity of entrepreneurs/not-for-profits companies are greater than that of managers. However, both are successful. Moreover, there are larger differences between entrepreneurs/not-for-profits companies whose primary culture is gauge growth versus those whose focus is on producing family income. Results also underscore the importance of precise construct definitions and rigorous measurement. The research question of the journal was clearly defined. MacMillan, Siegal, and Narshimha (1994) examined the methods that venture capitalist use to assess the senior managers of new ventures prior to making an investment decision. The lack of theory and empirical research in this area has light-emitting diode scholars to call for studies which examine the process of management team assessment in venture capital due diligence, as cited by Sieg el, Siegel and MacMillan, 1993. This research article assessed that to a greater extent research is needed on this subject matter, however the research question of the journal article was clearly defined there is a correlation between entrepreneurship behaviors and success. . ... The articles offer acuteness into the complex balancing act that thriving entrepreneurism must execute to generate support form distinct stakeholder markets. The value this research provides is insight on thriving entrepreneurs/not-for-profits companies and financial success. The correlation between successful entrepreneurs/not-for- profits companies depicts the behavior pattern of the individuals capacity to build relationships with private investors, foundations, venture capitalist or Angels instead of with the stakeholders monies. In turn, the literature suggests that a thriving entrepreneurs financial success is in how they treat the people who fund their drive. This reflects a dominant logic of caus ation taking a particular effect as giving and focusing on selection between means to cause this effect (Sarasvathy, 2001). The network theory, which is a social network approach, views organizations in society as a system of objects joined by a variety of relations. The end of this empirical research analysis is to show that the behavior trait of being a builder of relationships is the cause of a thriving entrepreneurs financial success. This example is seen through the transition towards defining strategy as a perspective rather than a position, meaning that strategy is seen in wide terms, as the theory of the business (Drucker, 1994). However, the element of entrepreneurial leadership is not clearly present in the empirical evidence. Entrepreneurial leadership is defined by Coven and Slevin (1991) as consisting of the following the nourishment of an entrepreneurial capability, protection of innovations that threaten